<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>LAPS on maxtsec</title><link>https://maxtsec.com/tags/laps/</link><description>Recent content in LAPS on maxtsec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://maxtsec.com/tags/laps/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>OffSec Proving Grounds Practice - Hutch Writeup</title><link>https://maxtsec.com/offsec-pg-hutch-writeup/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://maxtsec.com/offsec-pg-hutch-writeup/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="offsec-proving-grounds-practice---hutch-writeup"&gt;OffSec Proving Grounds Practice - Hutch Writeup&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is my writeup for &lt;strong&gt;Hutch&lt;/strong&gt;, a Windows Active Directory machine from OffSec Proving Grounds Practice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Compared with my previous AuthBy writeup, this lab was more focused on &lt;strong&gt;Active Directory enumeration and privilege escalation&lt;/strong&gt;. The most important lesson was that a domain compromise does not always start with an exploit. In this case, the attack path came from careful LDAP enumeration, credential discovery, BloodHound analysis, and abuse of LAPS read permissions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>